Your Going Natural 2.0 Questions Answered

Hey folks!

IMPORTANT: This post is all about answering a bunch of the questions that we've gotten about our last two videos. There is a LOT of serious MEAT in this post, so PLEASE be sure to read the LAST QUESTION. There's a rumor that's started up, and it's important that I squash that rumor right now.

Plus there's a bit of a hint of some VERY cool stuff that I'll be releasing very soon.

But first -

Holy Moly! We are receiving an amazing avalanche of feedback here on the StomperBlog from the "Double Your Traffic" and "Destroy Duplicate Content" videos.

I'm very grateful to everyone, and humbled by all the praise.

(What?! I can be humble! Sometimes!) ;)

But along with the praise, you guys sent along your questions and your requests for clarification. That's just GREAT for me, because that means you're watching the videos, and you "get" them. That's what StomperNet is all about. We want to make this stuff not only understandable, but we want to make it EASY. We also love interactivity and feedback.

The more you guys post your questions and comments, the better we can find the sticking points and get you un-stuck. Success is going to come with taking action, and you can't pick up the ball and run with it if you have questions about the play book, right?

That's why I've taken a break from working on the next video to reply to some of the more pressing questions we've gotten.

Now, you've probably noticed that I often reply directly to the comments here. However, I thought these questions below brought up particularly important points, and I wanted to make sure I got them in front of everyone who can use them, rather than just posting into the comments.

Before I get to the Q&A, I want to officially ask for even MORE questions and concerns! We really do read them, and as you can see here, we'll try our best to remove any obstacle on your own path to success!

Without further ado, it's answer time:

Q. You said that "Your chosen domain name has little to no affect on your SERPs". Well, I have to dis that - at least two of my sites have top rankings almost solely because of their chosen domain names. Maybe you were meaning something else and I just misheard. - Chris

A. Hi Chris, great question. You know what's funny? I already kind of answered it accidentally in the same video! You remember later in the video when I gave you the trick about keyword stuffing your URLs so your articles will link back to you with your keywords? The same principle is what's at work when we're talking about keyword-rich
domain names.

It's true that your domain name has no REAL effect on your SERPS.

BUT if you have a domain name which contains your target keywords, when people use your URL as the text to link to you, you'll start to rank for those words. This happens for the exact same reason it works in the article bio box example I gave in the video. Hope that clears things up for you and anyone else who might have got confused on that point.

Q. …One observation on making the text an image file on your example site on the mortgage disclaimer. Why is that better to do than just placing that text on a separate page - linking to it - and then blocking that folder or file to that page in your robots.txt file?

This will keep the search engine spiders from spidering that page and therefore will see no duplicate content as well. - Chad

A. Another great question, Chad. The key to that answer lies in the question itself. In the mortgage industry, you need disclaimers on every single page for legal reasons. For that example, the image disclaimer with the alt tags is the best solution, because that info NEEDS to be on every page or you'll get in big trouble.

If you aren't in an industry that has such requirements, your example is the recommended solution. In fact, that's the most common way people handle Terms of Service and Privacy Policies. So there's your answer!

Q. I was a bit confused about the title tags, after removing the stop words, then what? Do you need totally different words in each title, or is a certain percentage of similarity acceptable to mother Google? - Ronald

A. Let me eliminate your confusion Ronald. There's no target percentage for your title tags, necessarily. It depends on how much content you have on your pages. For example, if the pages on your site are short on content, then your title tags will need to be significantly different.

However, if your pages have a lot of content on them, it's less important that your title tags be unique. The more total content on the page, the less you have to worry about title tags. However, you should still make each one unique if you can, since it's a good practice.

Your title tags are displayed in the SERPs, so it's an opportunity to communicate with your visitors before they hit your site. Take that opportunity and tell them exactly what they can expect when they visit you.

Q. Just wondering, how do you avoid duplicate content in blogs, where different ‘pages’ are created on the fly using existing content? Eg: there may be multiple category or tag ‘pages’ where the same few posts appear… - Rob

A. Rob, this is similar to what I stated above. It's not necessarily a problem that you have repetitive content on your blog, as these different blog page templates will arrange that content in different ways. Whether it's a factor in your rankings or not depends on how frequently you update your blog, and how long your posts are. Here's the way to tell if it's a factor or not.

Simply take a look at your different "pages": Home page, Category page, Post Page, etc. How unique is the content on each page? If you're posting frequently enough, and with enough content in each post, each of those pages should be significantly different - more than enough to avoid being seen as duplicates. If the pages look too similar, tweak your templates. Show more posts on the homepage, or show only post excerpts in you categories, rather than full posts. Those should help make the pages as unique as possible.

Q. What would you think about (on smaller sites) going to the trouble of changing the alt tags on the template images that repeat on every page to contribute to page uniqueness? Or would this seem like manipulation to the search engines since they could probably determine the image file names aren’t changing on each page, just the alt text? - Brad

A. This one's going to depend on your site also, Brad. I don't think there's a danger of the search engines seeing this as manipulation, but it takes away the benefit of having a template in the first place, and seems like a lot of work to me. The "smarter" way to overcome your template duplication is by adding more unique content to each page, and leaving the template alone.

As I recommend in the video, make the percentage of content text on the page exceed the percentage of template text and you should have no penalties for duplication. Plus, rather than spending your time changing alt text (which your visitors will most likely never see) you'll be spending your time creating more unique content (which your visitors AND the search engines LOVE)!

This one's from a StomperNet member!

Q. I wish G would allow me to push a third page… or would that be the death-knell of the double and turn it into an authority site which I would gather does not convert as well? - Anthony

A. To tell the truth, we don't know exactly why or how Google decides to make an authority site listing. However, based on what we DO know, we don't think it's related to the multiple listings or indents. Is it possible to get two indents on the same results page? I've never seen it. Is it possible to have an authority site listing AND another page from the same site on a results page?

Yes!

We've seen this happen, but we're still testing to figure out how this happens and how to do it on purpose. :) I want to add a note about conversion as well. We don't have enough data to speak with certainty about whether authority listings convert better or worse than regular indents. However, the authority listings take up a LOT of screen real estate, and will push your competitors farther down the page.

Who doesn't like that? :)

And here's the last one - and I bet almost every single one of you had this question in the back of your mind…

LAST IMPORTANT QUESTION:

Q. What are you guys hinting at launching? Jeff Walker and Frank Kern just don’t start blasting out emails over free stuff. - Richard

A. I've started getting lots of comments and questions about what's coming. It seems that some people think that GN 2.0 is just a build up to me opening SN back up again.

Let me squash that rumor right now. SN has been closed since last May, and this is NOT a build up to me re-opening SN.

I am honored to call Frank Kern and Jeff Walker friends of mine, and they are definitely on my cell phone speed dial - but you're right, Richard.

Those guys didn't just mail out about my GN 2.0 videos for nothing.

You see, we DO have something coming. And it's going to happen VERY fast so you need to pay attention.

I will have more details in just a couple of days, but right now I can tell you this - we are about to launch a piece of software that will *almost* magically increase your web sites conversion. And I'm not talking about something cheesy that puts some gimmick popup or something on your site.

I have literally spent TENS of thousands developing this tool - it's not rocket science, but it's pretty darn close. This software let's you zero in on your web site and pinpoint exactly where site is leaking profits. You just plug those profit leaks, and watch what happens to your bottom line. It's that simple.

Now I know you are used to these huge super-expensive product launches, and you're probably a little worried about sticker shock when we release this thing. After all, it seems like there's another $2000 or $3000 product released every week.

Well, I want to be clear here - I know with it being Christmas time a lot of people are a bit tight on cash… and since it IS the season of giving and generosity.

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised when we launch this software tool.

But FIRST - I'm going to release another video, and it's about optimizing your site in a way I have NEVER seen taught anywhere before.

If you thought my first two GN 2.0 videos were groundbreaking - well, reserve your judgement until you see this.

Hope everyone is having a great holiday so far, and we'll talk again super-soon!

Stay Tuned,
Andy Jenkins

P.S. If you've had a question about either of our videos, PLEASE post to the comments! We're checking it all day every day, and that's your best bet to get your question answered. And of course, even if you don't have a question, we'll accept compliments and praise as well. What? I said I CAN be humble. Just not right now. :)

P.P.S. I'll also have more details about the software we'll be launching in just a few days, so watch your inbox, watch the StomperBlog, and if you haven't - Watch the "Double Your Traffic" and "Destroy Duplicate Content" videos AGAIN! Don't just watch - put those tactics into action today.

Post a Comment

36 Comments

  1. Posted December 20, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    Hi Andy,
    I've founded both videos useful…
    Your marketing approach is a good blend of :

    edward bernay [*creative] & george gallup [*Q&A-informative]…the webset int'l is gonna luv' ya for it[*especially : the Quality-stuff that free]…{wink!}
    larry/northsite

  2. Posted December 21, 2007 at 11:02 am

    Hi Andy,

    First, thanks. The new videos are great.

    Second, a detail question. When linking internal pages together, does it make any difference if you use file URLs like:

    link

    versus

    link

    Does Google attach different levels of importance to the two styles of links, or are they equally valid?

    Thanks again,
    Bayard

  3. Posted December 21, 2007 at 11:06 am

    LOL :)

    I didn't realize they would be interpreted!

    I was trying to compare a shortcut file URL like "./info.php" to a full URL like "http://northernnecksearch.com/info.php". Would using a shortcut URL be just as valid when creating links for the indented pages?

    Thanks. Please feel free to edit or delete these comments.

    Bayard

  4. Posted December 21, 2007 at 2:14 pm

    Great video Andy. You look right handsome in your suit of armor! Very slenderizing my dear. Go eat another donut!

    Thanks for all your info.

  5. Posted December 21, 2007 at 2:17 pm

    Nice read and nice question, I would like to help the fellow Rob and try to answer his question more like in depth than what was answered. The problem with WP (mainly, but don't know which platform Rob uses) is that the same page gets repeated several times, homepage, secondary pages of homepage, category page, secondary pages of categories, archives, secondary pages of archives and finally the post page. What I did to protect the postpage was to completely eliminate the duplicate content by using excerpts on homepage, okey now excerpts show the first 200-300 words of the post, but when writing a post lower you will notice a block option called "optional excerpt" where you can write a text that will appear as excerpt when using excerpts.

    I have explained more eliminating duplicate content on this post http://www.dnseo.net/how-to-eliminate-duplicate-content/ (feel free to block the outgoing link if you find it in appropriate).

    Hope this helps to Rob and the others.

  6. Posted December 21, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    Any,
    Just had the peasure of your second video. I've never seen such great production that wasn't selling something outright.
    I am now busy checking and amending my pages. Thanks ever so much.
    One question: Why do we have to wait so long for each video - are you sleep at night or something?

    (Reply from Andy Jenkins– Lee, don't worry we are in the process of getting out more Going Natural 2.0 Videos, please keep in mind we are servicing our hundreds of StomperNet Members and it is the Holiday Season…
    Unless you were just kidding! :)

  7. Posted December 21, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Thank you for summarizing and answering those questions, Andy. I just watched the two videos and decided to check the blog before starting on making my changes. I'm sure glad I did!

    Great work! Thank you very much.
    …/Paul

  8. Posted December 21, 2007 at 7:09 pm

    As always, a great video - well-produced with informative and usable content.

    However, I think it's worth pointing out that your technique for counting the words will work for many, if not most sites, there are a few factors you need to be aware of if you're using some scripts.

    For example, on one of our sites, www.ParvoBuster.com, there are scripts that:

    - show a scrolling breaking news section

    - provide dynamic tooltips when you mouse over certain words / phrases

    - have expandable / contractable text

    - have a whole other exit page hidden that only appears when somebody tries to leave the page.

    With all of these scripts, the text is already loaded with the page, but you can't see it all under normal circumstances. You need to wait for news to scroll past, or hover over text with the mouse, of expand a block of content, or try to leave the page, and then it will be visible.

    However, I strongly suspect that the search engine spiders see all of this content all of the time, so remember to count this when you're working out your template vs. content ratio.

  9. Posted December 21, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    Can the stunt-double. You are much more charismatic. Oh, The content is great! Thanks for sharing your wisdom

  10. Posted December 21, 2007 at 10:01 pm

    Thanks very much for this critical advice and instruction. I understand how this method works with regular html pages, but I would appreciate learning how it can be applied to a flash site? Please clarify: Do I need to create a static page that links back to the index page in order to optimize for ranking?

  11. Karen
    Posted December 21, 2007 at 11:45 pm

    Andy,
    I got to your site via Eben Pagen. He is so awesome, I knew whoever he'd refer me to was also awesome! I was not disappointed!

    At the beginning of the video, I'm thinking "duplicate content wha????"…in other words, I had NO IDEA.

    In the video, you explained things so clearly and I loved the cartoons and graphics (I'm very visual).

    I really appreciate all the effort you take to give us this VALUABLE free content. You are helping me immensely.

    I look forward to all your videos.
    Fondly,
    Karen
    P.S. I'm sending your link to all my Millionaire Mind friends (T.Harv Eker buddies) and associates!

  12. Posted December 22, 2007 at 10:28 am

    Hi Andy, here's my latest update.

    Not only did your first two videos help me get the No. 1 position in Google for my keyphrase out of 10,700 sites, but I now got a double listing for the site in less than 2 weeks!

    So essentially, I'm No 1 & 2 in Google and my traffic is doubling just like that.

    Your SEO strategies get right to the meat of it… thank you so much!

    Hey since I'm now a bona fided SEO expert, are you guys hiring? ;o)

    Lewi

  13. Delilah
    Posted December 22, 2007 at 10:57 am

    Hi Andy! Thank you for such insightful videos! I do have a question though pertaining to your calculation for Duplicate Content. You are basically saying that "if" your main content area has more "words" than your template area (footer, header and sidebar areas), that we should be fine. However, I have a digg-style format type of site that contains both PUBLISHED and UPCOMING content. Both of these main content areas list summaries of stories to vote on and contain 10 stories before the PAGINATION takes over. These pages are more than triple the wording for template areas as you say. There is much debate about if these digg-style formats contain duplicate content and MANY people say that a search engine will not index these pages, but rather place them as supplemental results.

    The dilemma is that when these pages PAGINATE at the bottom, every single page beyond the home page (ie: page 1, page 2, page 3, etc) is very NEAR the exact same word count from the previous home page, plus they all have the same meta and title tags because essentially they are only paginating. Even though the word count is still more than triple the word count of the template areas, isn't this still considered "Duplicate Content" to a search engine spider, as they will see that each of these pages are not that different from the home page? Or is the whole Digg-style site containing duplicate content a myth?

  14. Posted December 22, 2007 at 12:00 pm

    OK Andy, now let me ask a question about marrying the information from the first two videos. My navigation 'frame' is all text based, which I now understand to be a grade-A 'no-no' from the point of view of poor duplicate content scores. So, I'm thinking I'm going to go back and create image tags for all of my navigation.

    But wait! I also want to get double listings and now I'm going to strip the potential key-word text out of my links in my navigation frame and this is going to injure my chances of double listings. Yes, I will still have my content pane, but the length of this varies significantly by page, and I'd like to maximize the number of keyword phrases for which I can get a double listing. If my navigation is keyword rich, shouldn't that be a logical place to start?

    Which leads me to a home-brew solution I'd like your thoughts on.

    If the keywords are in tags for the image links in my navigation, will google see and count them?

    Thank you for the help.

    OH… BTW… How on earth do I go about positioning myself as a major authority hub (you know, like you've got, with the sub-pages listed right on the ranking)?

  15. Posted December 22, 2007 at 12:03 pm

    Darn html based editors…

    the line above "Thank you for the help." in my prior post is supposed to read…

    "If the keywords are in 'alt' tags for the image links…"

    I put the alt inside the html 'brackets' and the page must have read it as a tag and not as text, so it dropped from view.

    Thanks

  16. Posted December 22, 2007 at 4:44 pm

    Hi Andy,
    Thank you for your wonderful advice for the duplicate content penalty.
    I knew I had the site content duplicate problem
    but I did not know exactly what was going on.
    Now I am pretty clear that I need to fix my site problem.
    Thanks again for great teaching,

  17. Posted December 22, 2007 at 6:12 pm

    Hi Andy.

    Just discovered you. Yahuu! My site has been off the ground for only 2 weeks and I'm already changing and refining. I see I have a long way to go yet. Still, I think I'm doing some things right.

    I'd be honoured if you visited
    www.BestRobotVac.com

    I guess I should be trying to optimize the key word right in my url, eh?

    I'll be re-watching your videos, and studying everything else you send our way.

    Truly thankful,
    Barbara

  18. Posted December 24, 2007 at 2:50 am

    Hi Andy,
    Thanks for great content and tips! Truly a good attention age example..!
    Wish you'd do some vids for blog optimizing. Using silos at higher level with regard to what you showed for internal site-linking strategies. I use SemPro CMS for building all my sites these days.

    Should I only not show my text widgets (for text ads, last posts, comments, updates etc) on al pages & posts or configure different settings for each? What about rotating or random display?

    Are php page elements in blogs considered same as html templates by google?

    Ah, yes, what about RSS2Blog? do I get penalized for duplicate content showing post extracts (in incoming rss feeds) on my pages?

    Would appreciate your reply,
    Thanks and Happy holidays!

    Eileen.

  19. Posted December 24, 2007 at 6:45 am

    Thanks for the videos. Great stuff. Hopefully you will leave them up for a while so that we can go back to them to rerun as necessary.

    Aloha,
    June

  20. Posted December 24, 2007 at 10:49 am

    Thanks for a very insightful, useful and timely video. I was about to make some major changes to my template, and can now take the info into consideration.

    One of the things I wanted to provide was more printer friendly pdf pages of the pages people might want to print off (I give practical tinkering instructions) but still want to have the html page. I know SEs can read pdf files, and I can't add a norobot tag to a file, so is there a work-around like zipping perhaps? I have held off those pdf pages because of duplication fear.

  21. Posted December 24, 2007 at 11:18 am

    Hey Andy,

    Enjoyed the videos very much, thanks…

    Here is what I think might be an interesting question. Can these techniques work if used inside an e-book ? I am creating audio e-books and started to wonder if I should use the principals discussed and include them when constructing my pages for an e-book product? May not have anything to do with getting listings on Google, but how about the page construction when dealing with eye contact places, page layout, and order button placement, etc. What do you think ? Might help increase clicks on links which should increase profitability of the final e-book product?

    Will be interested to see what you think.
    Scott

  22. Sally P Stilwell
    Posted December 24, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    I may be spoiling your launch of your new software here, but you have been showing it to us in the videos you have been showing us. (The Scrutinizing Eye) It looks very helpful, to us as website owners, to boost what we could have in profits, with tweaks we make to our sites.

    If, I am right and you don't post this, I'll know why.

    Thanks for all the video tips and trick you are giving us.

    Now, on to making me a site and fixing my blogs, so that can profit from your tips, and make enough to snag that new software!

    Thanks so much,
    Sally

    (Reply from Andy Jenkins - Don't worry Sally - you'll be able to "Afford it". Happy Holidays!)

  23. Ivonne
    Posted December 25, 2007 at 1:15 am

    Dear Andy,
    Thanks for the 3 videos I watched this afternoon! Wow! Duplicate Content & Indent, very useful indeed!

    I started a website 18mths ago, had trouble with it, so it is on hold. When a site is not `launched' yet, does it hurt its rankings if no activity? Or should I pull it off, until ready to launch?

    2 yrs ago I spent over $25,000 on a website (done by website designer) but had to dump it as it was not doing anything even with paying SEO & getting directory listing.
    I wish I had waited. I had too much money then & trusted the professionals to do it right!

    I did a US$2,000 SEO course this year by a `Top SEO Guru' but your `Free' videos taught me more. We had assignments & contests but the winners `secrets' were not open to the rest of class to learn.

    Your `free' videos make good karma by teaching things which other people make us pay (and even then limit what they release).

    I am still waiting to get my Stompernet Home study course (Bonus for buying Membership Site Bootcamp, Tim Kerber) through your link, so then I can complete my site and do others as well!

    I have sent email to Tom Ham today (Affiliate Manager?) for help. Could you pls ask Tom to follow up as well?

    Thanks for the free Scrutinizer!
    Look forward to more Greatness from Stompernet!

    Ivonne Teoh
    Sydney, Australia

  24. Christian
    Posted December 25, 2007 at 5:28 am

    Just a thought, but to reduce the chance of being flagged as duplicate content have you ever thought about randomising the order of the links using some simple php?

    I don't know whether it would work - Im not good at seo it was just an idea (less effort is always better)

    Christian

  25. Kathy
    Posted December 25, 2007 at 9:06 am

    Thank your for the videos Andy - most helpful and easy enough to understand as I start my journey on building pages and making squillions. Can the external links come from blogs on various platforms - eg hub pages, squidoo, wordpress etc?

    And now I'm showing how much of a newbie I am (or my age)- what are 'alt tags' and 'no robot tags'?

    (PS - I had to laugh at my 'anti-spam word' of 'snow' - I've just had a 44 degree Christmas Day in Australia)

  26. terry
    Posted December 27, 2007 at 6:43 pm

    Kind of curious about domain names. I think I read somewhere in your answers that the domain name itself doesn't help search engine ranking. If someone links to your site with the domain name in the link text, that's what counts. But I'm curious… All other things being equal (links, pages, etc), which would rank higher:

    www.mykeyword.com
    www.mysite.com/mykeyword

    If the domain name doesn't give any extra power, then they should be equal right?

    But it seems to me that the first shows up higher than the second when I do searching (Of course maybe all other things aren't equal).

  27. Posted December 28, 2007 at 9:40 pm

    Andy,

    You guys have gone way far over everything else on the Net. I never saw so much fine content, so freely available! I have learned so much in a just a few hours! No wonder my conversion rates were minimal.
    Let me just thank you for a heck of job.

    Best regards,

    Luis Gaviria

  28. A/ndy B
    Posted January 3, 2008 at 7:52 am

    Hi,

    Great videos… Thanks

    A bit advanced you ask? maybe.. but that's just how I need it.

    Keep 'em coming.

  29. Posted January 5, 2008 at 1:54 am

    Hi On turning parts of your template text into images to avoid double content: You covered how in only sentence, and I didn't understand how to do it. The term you used just before make a jif or jpg file I simply did not recognize?

    Your videos are awesome help for this beginner.

  30. Jane
    Posted January 5, 2008 at 11:31 am

    My question is about meta description tags. Currently my site uses the first few sentences of my product description for the content in my meta description tag. This happens on the server, so every description is unique to the SE's. However, now I am concerned that I may have duplicate content, because my meta description tag and my product description are similar. Is this a problem?

    (Reply from Andy Jenkins - Jane, don't worry about it. Meta Descriptions are hardly weighed at all for anything, and the content is in your head tag, and we don't have evidence to suggest that head tag content is calculated as part of page sameness. Title Tags are, so just keep that in mind)

  31. Posted January 7, 2008 at 12:33 am

    Hey Andy!!!

    About the whole "Double Listing" concept. Does that ONLY work for pages on your site found on the SAME page on Google. For instance, I couldn't use the techinique for a page on my site that already had established PR and ranking, but wasn't found on the same page as the listing found that I wanted to rank for would it?

  32. Posted January 7, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    will scrutinizer work for service companies?

    we have an invoice factoring company and have limited success with adwords.

    thank you

  33. Sharm
    Posted January 8, 2008 at 9:40 am

    Hi!

  34. Posted January 8, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    This is great material you have put out!

    I look forward to following it more closely.

    I love the way you have action points. They make everything a lot more helpful.

    I have been setting up an African stock photography website, and would like to steal some market share from Istock and Getty images. So I will need the best advice around on how to market this thing! It will take time, but with the help of guys like you and Ed, I should be able to steal some market share!

  35. Posted January 10, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Great work! Did you get your Flash 3D characters from a software package or did you make them yourself?

    Loved all the videos - learned more from this free stuff than I learn from most gurus that I pay.

  36. Posted January 11, 2008 at 12:31 am

    All I could say after watching the almost hour-long video is "Wow", and "Well I'll be damned".
    Thanks for a most stimulating and insightful compilation of useful stuff right to the last squeeze. I have been so disillusioned lately with internet marketing and the self proclaimed 'gurus', whose only interest is how to squeeze out your last dollar to add to their overflowing bank accounts.
    The way you have presented Social marketing in the presell video engages one's brain to think, and enables Newton's Laws of Motion to not only kick in, but akso to be do-able. I have been a member of a number of these Social Marketing websites, but never thought to make productive/monetizable use of them. If I can't build a massive traffic to my websites after all these flow of ideas, then I ought to quit internet marketing altogether. But I intend to go for it in '08.

    Thanks a mill., and thanks to the sender of this powerful thread into my life.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word